Organon F
Volume 30, November 2023, Issue 4, Pages 323–338
ISSN 2585-7150 (online) ISSN 1335-0668 (print)
Research Article
Discussion Notes on Rettler’s Active Reflection
Seong Soo Park
According to Rettler, there are three types of control that we should consider in relation to the legitimacy of doxastic blame: Intention-based, reason-based, and influence-based control. Rettler argues that among these, influence-based control is the only type of control that is necessary and sufficient for fulfilling the control condition required for legitimate doxastic blame. The aim of this short discussion paper is to critically assess Rettler’s view of doxastic control. By doing so, I attempt to defend the reason-responsiveness view from Rettler’s criticism and cast doubt on whether influence-based control has a positive epistemic influence on beliefs.
Lindsay Rettler; doxastic blame; ethics of belief; reason-responsiveness.
Author
Seong Soo Park
Affiliation
Sungkyunkwan University
Address
The Department of Philosophy, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Received
12 October 2023
Revised
31 October 2023
Accepted
2 November 2023
Publishers
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences
APA
Park, S.S. (2023). Discussion Notes on Rettler’s Active Reflection. Organon F, 30(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2023.30402
Chicago
Park, Seong Soo. 2023. "Discussion Notes on Rettler’s Active Reflection." Organon F 30 (4): 323–338. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2023.30402
Harvard
Park, S.S. (2023). Discussion Notes on Rettler’s Active Reflection. Organon F, 30(4), pp. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2023.30402
© Seong Soo Park
https://www.sav.sk/?lang=sk&doc=journal-list&part=article_response_page&journal_article_no=31623
The above URL is linked to the article's response page. The response page is a permanent location associated with the article's DOI number.
