Organon F
Volume 26, August 2019, Issue 3, Pages 474–490
ISSN 2585-7150 (online) ISSN 1335-0668 (print)
Research Article | Special issue on Reflecting on the Legacy of C.I. Lewis: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Modal Logic
Wiredu contra Lewis on the Right Modal Logic
David B. Martens
This paper is a critical study of an argument put forward by Kwasi Wiredu in his engagement with C. I. Lewis on choosing the right modal logic for logical necessity. Wiredu argues that Lewis “could have been more adventurous modally with perfect logicality” and could justifiably have accepted S4 rather than being “to the last cautious of any system stronger than S2” (Wiredu 1979). I address terse, incomplete, and provocatively incongruous notes on Wiredu’s paper by (Makinson 1980) and (Humberstone 2011), as well as a paper by (Cresswell 1965) that Humberstone cites, and I draw on recent work by (Lewitzka 2015; 2016). I conclude that Wiredu’s argument cannot be accepted as sound but a variant argument can be accepted as sound.
C.I. Lewis, equivalence, identity, Kwasi Wiredu, modal logic, S4.
Author
David B. Martens
Affiliation
University of the Witwatersrand
Address
Department of Philosophy, School of Social Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, South Africa
Received
31 October 2018
Accepted
2 March 2019
Published online
24 August 2019
Publishers
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences
APA
Martens, D.B. (2019). Wiredu contra Lewis on the Right Modal Logic. Organon F, 26(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2019.26307
Chicago
Martens, David B. 2019. "Wiredu contra Lewis on the Right Modal Logic." Organon F 26 (3): 474–490. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2019.26307
Harvard
Martens, D.B. (2019). Wiredu contra Lewis on the Right Modal Logic. Organon F, 26(3), pp. 474–490. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2019.26307
© David B. Martens
The above URL is linked with the article's response page. The response page is a permanent location that is associated with the article's DOI number.
This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).